Suction is where these two split hardest: the Dreame X60 Ultra pulls 35,000 Pa against the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow's 20,000 Pa, and it backs that up with an extendable side brush, a bigger dust bag, and a dock that adds detergent when it washes the mop pads. The Roborock counters with a roller mop, higher mop lifting for carpet transitions, and a price that lands well below the Dreame. Homes with pets, thick rugs, and a preference for hands-off upkeep should lean Dreame; anyone who mostly mops hard floors and wants to spend less gets a lot of the same automation from the Roborock.
Two different answers to the same question: how do you get a robot to mop well without you touching it? Dreame's X60 Ultra uses dual spinning pads with a dock that heats wash water to 212 °F and doses detergent automatically. Roborock's Qrevo Curv 2 Flow goes with a roller mop, one of the newer approaches to floor scrubbing, plus hot-air drying at 131 °F. Both run LiDAR and camera navigation, both empty their own bins, both handle multi-level maps. The gap shows up in vacuuming muscle, dock features, and what you pay to get there.
Dreame X60 Ultra
out of 10Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow
The Dreame takes the overall rating 9.2 versus 7.5, and most of that comes from cleaning, where it earns 8.8 against the Roborock's 7.3. That tracks with the suction difference and the larger dust bag. Features land much closer at 8.8 versus 8.6, since both models carry the same navigation hardware, voice platforms, and automation basics. Navigation is 8.1 versus 7.7, a small gap. On value, the X60 Ultra rates as good for the price and the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow as priced about right.
Vacuuming power sets the tone. 35,000 Pa on the Dreame is well past the Roborock's 20,000 Pa, and the X60 Ultra pairs it with an extendable side brush that reaches into corners the Roborock's two fixed brushes cannot quite get. Mopping is a genuine trade-off rather than a win: dual spinning pads at 230 RPM apply steady scrubbing pressure, and the Roborock's roller mop is the newest technology in this space, continuously fed and self-cleaning as it goes. Dock behavior differs too. The Dreame washes pads with 212 °F water and doses detergent, while Roborock washes at 167 °F with water and finishes with 131 °F hot air drying. Then there's the price, with the Roborock costing substantially less.
35,000 Pa against 20,000 Pa is a real gap, and the Dreame's extendable side brush swings out to sweep along baseboards and into corners. The Roborock answers with two side brushes and a larger onboard dust box, but both use the same dual rubber-and-bristle main brush setup.
This one is a legitimate tie because the two take different routes. Dual spinning pads at 230 RPM press and scrub in circles with 32 moisture settings, and the Roborock's roller mop at 220 RPM keeps a continuously rinsed surface against the floor, plus a taller 15 mm mop lift for crossing onto carpet.
Shedding homes should look at the Dreame first. The extra suction pulls embedded hair out of rug fibers more reliably, and the bigger dust bag in the dock means fewer trips to swap it out during heavy shedding season.
Both run the same obstacle avoidance stack: AI, camera, 3D structured light, and an LED for dark rooms, on top of LiDAR mapping. The Dreame edges ahead thanks to its dual RGB cameras and far greater ability to climb over thresholds and door frames rather than route around them.
The Dreame's dock washes mop pads at 212 °F and adds detergent to the wash, so pads come out cleaner between runs, and its 3.2 L dust bag outlasts the Roborock's 2.5 L. Roborock's station washes at 167 °F and dries with 131 °F warm air to keep pads from smelling.
6,400 mAh versus 5,200 mAh gives the Dreame more runtime per charge, which matters most in larger open-plan homes where a mid-clean recharge break stretches out the whole job.
Dead even here. Both support built-in voice commands plus Amazon, Google, and Apple, and both handle no-go zones, multi-level maps, smart carpet cleaning, and camera-based obstacle avoidance.
| Feature | Dreame X60 Ultra | Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | 35,000 Pa | 20,000 Pa |
| Mop Type | Dual spinning mop pads | Roller |
| Auto Detergent Dispensing | Yes | No |
| Battery Life | 6,400 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Extendable Side Brush | Yes | No |
| Mop Moisture Levels | 32 | 30 |
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase
Both robots navigate well, empty themselves, and clean their own mops, so neither choice leaves you babysitting. Pick the Dreame X60 Ultra if carpets, pet hair, and the most thorough dock automation drive your decision. Pick the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow if hard-floor mopping is the job and spending less matters.
