Both robots run dual spinning mop pads, LiDAR navigation, and auto-emptying docks, so the real split comes down to how they see obstacles. The eufy X10 Pro Omni adds an RGB camera with an LED light for identifying clutter in dim rooms, plus higher mop lifting and five floor maps. The Roborock QV 35A leans on 3D structured light instead, and pairs bigger dock tanks with Apple voice support, which suits buyers who want longer stretches between refills and a lower price.
Obstacle avoidance is the deciding line here. Both of these robots handle the fundamentals the same way: dual spinning mop pads that actively scrub, LiDAR for mapping, docks that empty the dustbin and wash the mop pads on their own. But they take different approaches to spotting a sock on the floor. eufy went with an RGB camera plus an LED light so the robot can actually see what's in front of it, even at night. Roborock chose 3D structured light, which projects a pattern to measure shapes. That difference, along with dock tank sizes and voice platform support, shapes who each one fits.
eufy X10 Pro Omni
out of 10Roborock QV 35A
The eufy takes the overall rating 7.2 versus 6.6, and navigation is where the gap opens up: 8.3 versus 7.0. That reflects the camera and LED combination, the five-level mapping, and slightly higher obstacle clearance. Cleaning sits closer at 7.0 versus 6.6, and features are nearly even at 6.2 versus 6.1. Both land in fair territory on value for what they charge. So the eufy's edge is mostly about how well it navigates, not how hard it cleans.
Start with vision. The X10 Pro Omni carries an RGB camera and an LED light, letting it identify and steer around obstacles in low light, and it stores up to five floor maps versus four. The QV 35A relies on 3D structured light instead, with no camera. Dock capacity flips the advantage: Roborock's clean and dirty water tanks and dust bag all hold more, meaning fewer trips to refill and empty. Mopping details go the other way, with eufy applying 9.8 N of downward pressure, lifting its pads 12 mm on carpet versus 10 mm, and drying them with heated air at 113 F. Roborock spins its pads slightly faster at 200 RPM against 180 RPM and offers 30 moisture levels compared to three. Apple voice control is Roborock-only.
Both use a single main brush, with eufy combining rubber and bristle while Roborock goes rubber-only. Rubber resists hair tangles better, bristle-rubber hybrids agitate carpet fibers a bit harder, so this one comes down to your flooring mix rather than a clear win.
Dual spinning mop pads on both, which is the strong end of mopping tech since the pads actively scrub instead of just dragging. eufy adds 9.8 N of pressure, a 12 mm mop lift to keep carpet dry, and 113 F heated air drying to stop pads from smelling; Roborock counters with 200 RPM spin speed and 30 water levels for fine control.
Roborock's dock dust bag holds a bit more, so a shedding golden retriever's worth of hair fills it slightly slower between bag changes. Both docks empty the robot automatically, so daily hair pickup isn't something you handle either way.
This is the eufy's strongest area. An RGB camera paired with an LED light lets it recognize cables and shoes even in a dark hallway, and it holds five floor maps to Roborock's four, plus 21 mm of obstacle clearance versus 20 mm. Roborock's 3D structured light measures object shapes accurately but has no camera or light to work with.
Roborock's dock carries more water in both the clean and dirty tanks, which means longer stretches before you top up or dump. eufy's advantage is heated air drying at 113 F, which keeps the mop pads from going musty between runs.
Effectively a wash. The QV 35A runs 180 minutes to eufy's 173, but eufy covers slightly more ground per charge at 1,615 sq ft versus 1,536 sq ft. Both handle a typical multi-room floor in one go, returning to recharge if needed.
Both cover Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant, no-go zones, multi-level maps, smart carpet cleaning, and obstacle avoidance. Roborock adds Apple support, which matters if your household runs on Siri and HomeKit routines.
| Feature | eufy X10 Pro Omni | Roborock QV 35A |
|---|---|---|
| Main Brush Type | Single (rubber & bristle) | Single (rubber) |
| Camera | Yes | No |
| Mop Moisture Levels | 3 | 30 |
| Light | Yes | No |
| Smart Obstacle Avoidance Technology | Camera + LED | 3D structured light |
| Voice Control Platforms | Amazon, Google | Amazon, Google, Apple |
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase
Neither of these is a bad buy, and they share more than they differ. Go eufy if obstacle-strewn floors and low-light cleaning are your reality, since the camera and light setup earns its keep there. Go Roborock if you want bigger dock tanks, Apple voice control, and a lower price for the same core mopping hardware.
